ROLE
TEAM
TIMELINE
SCOPE

THE PROBLEM
SYSTEM SCALE
Branch locations across the city
People served in the Philadelphia area
Employees across the library system
WHERE WE STARTED · THE MAP AND ITS UNOFFICIAL DESCENDANTS

CONSTRAINTS
01
02
03
DECISIONS & TRADEOFFS
DECISION 01
Hand-Drawn, Not Cartographic
CHOSE
A hand-drawn style paired with the library’s existing brand fonts, so the map felt approachable and easy to read instead of overly technical.
COST
It wasn’t meant to be geographically exact. The goal was to help people understand where branches were in relation to each other, not create a traditional city map.
DECISION 02
Major Highways, Not Landmarks
CHOSE
Only the major highways and rivers stayed as reference points, keeping the map simple while still giving people enough context to understand where they were.
COST
Leaving out landmarks meant fewer visual cues for people who navigate the city that way, but adding too many would have made the map crowded again.
DECISION 03
One System Map, Nine Cluster Slips
CHOSE
One full city map for the big picture, plus individual cluster slips that made it easier for someone to focus on the branches closest to them.
COST
It meant maintaining ten pieces instead of one, but each branch had something much more useful to hand to patrons instead of relying on the full city map for everything.
FINAL PRODUCT · ONE SYSTEM, THREE FORMATS




RESULTS
Digital impressions
HOW THE MAP EVOLVED

WHAT I'D DO DIFFERENTLY
FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA DISCOVERY
NEXT PROJECT
